Cook IVC (Inferior Vena Cava) Filters are small devices designed to be implanted into the inferior vena cava—the large vein that carries blood from the lower half of the body back to the heart—to prevent blood clots from traveling to the lungs, which could result in a pulmonary embolism.
Individuals may choose to pursue legal action against the manufacturer, Cook Medical, if they experienced severe injuries potentially related to the use of Cook IVC Filters.
Some reported complications that might lead to litigation include, but are not limited to:
The product liability lawsuits allege that design defects in Cook IVC filter may have caused the filter to fracture and/or migrate, which may cause the perforation of an organ.
If you or a loved one has experienced complications resulting from a Cook IVC Filter device, you may be eligible for compensation. Please contact the New York attorneys at Rheingold Giuffra Ruffo Plotkin & Hellman for a free consultation today. Our experienced team has over 50 years of experience with defective medical devices and medical malpractice cases.
There are many new litigation developments relating to appeal decisions, more trials, and settlement claim categorization. If you may have a future Cook IVC filter lawsuit, or currently are a plaintiff, these could affect you.
Judge Young has encouraged settlement discussions, but there have been no formal announcements of resolution. Some attorneys believe that recent developments, including the Case Categorization Forms (discussed below), will help the judge with settlement matters. There are about 7,500 cases pending.
There was a decision in Parton v. Cook Medical, LLC, No. 22-2256 (7th Cir. 2023). At issue was the definition of an “injury.” IVC filters can migrate and fracture, resulting in injured organs and the need for removal. Sometimes the filter may stubbornly lodge in the vena cava wall but not pose any immediate risk, although may pose future risk. The appeals court side-stepped the main issue and instead addressed the claim value. These suits are in federal court and plaintiffs must contend that their damages exceed $75,000.00. Otherwise, the lawsuit is filed in a state court.
To sort this out, Judge Young has asked all plaintiffs to submit “Claim Categorization Forms.” (See Below) Each plaintiff will now have the chance to explain the exact condition of the filter and related injuries, as well as certify the claim exceeds $75,000.00.
IVC filters fail in different ways and cause different injuries. The Form has seven categories. These range from “product-in-place” to wrongful death injuries. Medical records are attached to the form. Filters fail by fracturing, migrating and tilting. An injury can result in one or more repair surgeries. There are two types of surgeries:
Cook’s first-generation retrievable filter is the Gunther Tulip Filter, released in 2000. A second-generation model known as the Celect was released in 2007. Judge Young has had test rials for the Celect filter. He now has expressed interest in Gunther Tulip trials. Plaintiffs are opposed to this because it will slow down settlement. This issue will be decided soon.
There is ongoing litigation against Cook for injuries caused by their IVC Filters. Allegations include (but not limited to):
Read more about information and potential defects of Cook IVC Filters HERE.
Our experienced lawyers help victims of defective medical devices nationwide. To discuss your case with our team, call (212) 684-1880 or contact us online.
We fight tirelessly to deliver results and we are not afraid to go to trial.
We are leaders and educators in legal issues involving personal injury, medical malpractice, and product liability.
We have the experience to handle your case all while providing individualized attention.